Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1993)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Comparison of Unix-based listserver software?
From: tasos @ cs . bu . edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1993 12:21:50 -0500 (EST)
To: tower @ prep . ai . mit . edu
Cc: riddle @ is . rice . edu, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9312050425 . AA14111 @ nutrimat . gnu . ai . mit . edu> from "tower @ gnu . ai . mit . edu" at Dec 4, 93 11:25:13 pm

> 
>    From: riddle @
 is .
 rice .
 edu (Prentiss Riddle)
>    Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1993 07:46:52 -0600 (CST)
>    X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
>    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>    Content-Length: 816       
>    Precedence: bulk
> 
>    Hi.  Some people here at Rice are evaluating Unix-based listserver
>    software.  The intention is to replace our mainframe-based LISTSERV,
>    although we have not yet decided whether an exact LISTSERV clone is a
>    must.
> 
>    My question: Has anyone done a comparison of features among the various
>    available packages?  Or even compiled a list of the leading contenders
>    which someone making this decision should look at?

A feature-by-feature comparison between procmail, majordomo and the
listprocessor was posted on this list some time ago; check this list's archives
(anon ftp to ftp.greatcircle.com).

Tasos


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Comparison of Unix-based listserver software?
From: tower @ gnu . ai . mit . edu
Next: non-LISTSERV list managers
From: owner @ ccnext . ucsf . edu (Richard Karpinski)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Comparison of Unix-based listserver software?
From: tower @ gnu . ai . mit . edu
Next: Re: Comparison of Unix-based listserver software?
From: riddle @ is . rice . edu (Prentiss Riddle)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com