Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: sendmail delayed delivery notification too soon?
From: Alan Thew <Alan . Thew @ liverbird . liverpool . ac . uk>
Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 19:13:33 +0100 (BST)
To: pjg @ acsu . buffalo . edu
Cc: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199505102056 . QAA13346 @ urth . acsu . buffalo . edu> from "Paul Graham" at May 10, 95 04:56:23 pm

In the last mail, Paul Graham wrote:
> 
> do most people consider the default sendmail v8 delayed delivery notify
> time too short?  on my workstation 10 minutes seems about right but a
> number of list managers think 8 hours is way too short.
> 
We generate them after 3 days which may seem like too long.....

-- 
Alan Thew
alan .
 thew @
 liv .
 ac .
 uk   ...!uknet!liv!alan.thew   Tel: +44 151 794-4497
University of Liverpool, Computing Services     Fax: +44 151 794-4442


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: sendmail delayed delivery notification too soon?
From: Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer <info-labview-request @ pica . army . mil>
Next: Purpose of digests ?
From: Andrew Cormack <scoanc @ thor . cf . ac . uk>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: sendmail delayed delivery notification too soon?
From: Gene Rackow <rackow @ mcs . anl . gov>
Next: Re: sendmail delayed delivery notification too soon?
From: Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer <info-labview-request @ pica . army . mil>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com