Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(October 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Automated bounce recognition
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 19:18:19 -0700
To: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Message from "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org> of "Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:49:19 PDT." <5 . 1 . 0 . 14 . 0 . 20011020174807 . 08c58140 @ gopostal . onlinepolicy . net>
References: <Message from "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg @ monkeys . com> <85789 . 1003604790 @ monkeys . com> <85789 . 1003604790 @ monkeys . com> <5 . 1 . 0 . 14 . 0 . 20011020174807 . 08c58140 @ gopostal . onlinepolicy . net>

On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:49:19 -0700 
Roger B A Klorese <Roger> wrote:
> At 05:06 PM 10/20/2001 -0700, you wrote:

>> Bounces have the unique quality of have a null return envelope.
>> Filter on that and you'll have no problem.  (

> With the number of sites violating RFCs and rejecting
> null-envelope bounce messages, my list owners are not getting
> their lists' bounces.  I am seriously considering putting in a
> return address on them from here on.

There's a simple handling for such: null route their mail.  If/when
they fix their configs, remove the filter.

-- 
J C Lawrence
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw @
 kanga .
 nu               He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Automated bounce recognition
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg @ monkeys . com>
Next: Re: Automated bounce recognition
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Automated bounce recognition
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Next: Re: Automated bounce recognition
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com