Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: List-ID
From: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: 01 Dec 2001 22:36:19 -0800
To: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Tom Neff's message of "Sun, 02 Dec 2001 00:37:12 -0500"
References: <49374187 . 1007253432 @ [192 . 168 . 0 . 4]>
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)

Tom Neff <tneff @
 panix .
 com> writes:

> There is no big problem, that's for sure.  I merely note
> parenthetically, in passing so to speak, that List-ID prevents nothing,
> solves nothing, assures nothing, and simplifies nothing,

It's a nice thing to put into procmail rules rather than trying to figure
out what combination of Sender, X-Loop, Mailing-List, Resent-From, To, or
envelope sender seems unlikely to change at the whim of the list-admin and
the software they use.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra @
 stanford .
 edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Follow-Ups:
  • Re: List-ID
    From: Norbert Bollow <nb @ thinkcoach . com>

References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: List-ID
From: Tom Neff <tneff @ panix . com>
Next: Re: List-ID: (was: subscriber address in To: field)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: List-ID
From: Tom Neff <tneff @ panix . com>
Next: Re: List-ID
From: Norbert Bollow <nb @ thinkcoach . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com