I note that today, without further explanation or announcement, the Digest
numbering for List-Managers has been restored, and at least my own personal
copy of the Digest is back in text format - I don't know whether this was
done for my exclusive benefit as a "squeaky wheel" or across-the-board.
The reason I am guessing about all these things is that the management of
THIS list has said nothing, before, during or after. It is ironic that a
forum set up so that working list managers could support each other and do
their jobs better, should itself set such a shoddy example to its members.
I think the operator of this list might want to JOIN it and introduce
By the way, do you love the "list manager universe in microcosm" aspect of
this? No sooner did I mention the tinkering than someone pipes up with "If
you don't like the list host's methods and policies, you are always welcome
to setup your own list..."! hehehe... (What's next, "if you don't like
reading, you can always hit DELETE"?)
The lesson for working managers is: Always notify your membership as far in
advance as reasonably possible of any upcoming hardware or software changes
that they're likely to notice. If you're transitioning from one software
package to another, make sure you know how to preserve as many settings as
possible, and ask here or on your old & new software's support forums if
you're not sure. Make sure there is a contact person announced for members
who have trouble after the switch, and make sure that members know how to
change their own settings afterward. Don't assume "you're the exception"
and that what's wise for "ordinary lists" somehow doesn't apply to yours:
it probably does.