Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MUA elitism
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 14:20:44 -0800
To: "Tom Neff" <tneff @ grassyhill . net>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
Reply-to: rogerk @ queernet . org

>That varies by the choice of topic and the preferences (and energy) of 
the 
>list admins, obviously.  Some lists devolve into a general 
>chowder-and-marching society for the clique of core subscribers, while 

>others make at least a halfhearted effort to stay on topic.

Again, "devolve" vs. "effort" indicates what you think is *the* *way* 
*it* *ought* *to* *be*, at least so it seems.  But for many people, they 
don't fail to achieve that -- it's never a goal.  Those lists are not 
intended to be on-topic -- they're intended to be salons that attract 
people who have some overlapping interests.





Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: On client defaults and list configurations
From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb @ greatcircle . com>
Next: Re: OE and MIME [Was: Please prune this list!]
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey @ goldmark . org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: MUA elitism
From: Bill Gruber <BIGCU @ CUNYVM . CUNY . EDU>
Next: Re: MUA elitism
From: Tom Neff <tneff @ grassyhill . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com