Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 2002)

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: identifying list mail by any appearance in the headers
From: JC Dill <inet-list @ vo . cnchost . com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 14:51:12 -0700
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com (list-managers)
In-reply-to: <200207062030 . g66KUIu14313 @ pop2a . ripco . com>
References: <5 . 0 . 0 . 25 . 2 . 20020706112817 . 039f0eb0 @ pop3 . vo . cnchost . com>

On 01:30 PM 7/6/02, David W. Tamkin wrote:

>{I was once trapped by a similar mistake to the one I was describing.  A list
> had been abandoned by its manager; left on autopilot it was going into the
> toilet.  A member created a replacement under the same name on a different
> server.  I wanted mail from the two lists in the same folder, and the only
> thing their headers had in common was the local part in From_.  So I put in
> a procmail recipe that checked the string between 'From ' and '@' and nothing
> else.
> Well, a short time later came the initial wave of vanity domains. One member > chose to subscribe (and post) to every list he was on as listname @
his .
domain .

> I sent a private response to a post of his.  He wrote back to me from the
> same address, quoting some of my own text back to me.  But I had not noticed
> that he was using this new vanity address, so when his private reply to my
> private message landed in my folder for the list, I thought he had posted it
> and I ripped him a new one.  He replied puzzled, acknowledging that what I

I've had this happen when I replied to a message from a hobby list that uses the list identifier in the subject line. I hadn't changed the subject line in my *private* email to the author, but the author saw the subject line and assumed the message was "from the list". I've had private emails quoted and replied to on the list, and I've had people scream at me "how could you post such and such about me" when what I had sent was private email.

It's one reason I detest list identifiers in subject lines. I think this solution causes more problems than it solves.

> thought he had done would of course have been wrong but denying that he had
> done it.  When his second private message also went into my folder for the
> list, I looked at his headers and saw what was going on. I apologized to him
> for my error but left it clear how he had contributed to it.  Then I changed
> my procmail condition's regexp to OR the two list servers' domains instead of
> ending with the at-sign.
> I don't have, want, nor need a domain of my own, at least not the way my life > and the net are in 2002 [both may change over the next few years]; but I have > subdomains from three providers where I can create addresses with any syntac- > tically permitted local part I choose, but if I ever were to set up different
> addresses for every list I'm on, for sure I would not use the list's name,
> nor any string including the exact list name, as my address on the list. Ab- > breviate the list's name, pun it, encipher it, reverse it (unless it's a pal- > indrome), but don't copy it. Don't lay traps for people. And that's besides
> the inherent arrogance of using the list's name for yourself as if you were
> the list and your posts were official announcements about it.}

I see a lot of these addresses (and have used a fair number of them myself), and I run into a lot of problems with people trying to remember which address they used for this particular list. Using the list name is the system that requires the least bookkeeping to remember which address goes with which list. After you have seen it a few times, it no longer causes others to think the address is an official address of the list management.


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MUA elitism
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk @ magpage . com>
Next: Re: Header fields (Was: Re: Please prune this list!)
From: JC Dill <inet-list @ vo . cnchost . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: identifying list mail by any appearance in the headers
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Next: OE and MIME [Was: Please prune this list!]
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey @ goldmark . org>

Search Internet Search