Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(July 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:50:29 -0400
To: list-managers <list-managers @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <16715 . 1026862136 @ kanga . nu>
References: <Message from J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu> <16166 . 1026860526 @ kanga . nu> <5 . 1 . 0 . 14 . 2 . 20020716160955 . 27ecfb58 @ parrot-int . squawk . com> <16166 . 1026860526 @ kanga . nu>

At 04:28 PM 2002-07-16 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
Rephrased the way I actually meant:

  Having multiple addresses in Reply-To is a Good Thing and Damned
  Useful.

And AOL will throw your mail on the floor if the mail seems to come from an AOL user and is going back to AOL, or at least that is what we seem to have discovered. It is fine if the list of reply-tos is for addresses outside of AOL. I wonder if this is an issue where they presume that AOL users can't set reply-to, so any mail with a reply-to inside of AOL must be forged?


--
J C Lawrence
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw @
kanga .
nu               He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.

--
"Forgive him, for he believes that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature!"
 -- George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
Nick Simicich - njs @
scifi .
squawk .
com




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Next: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Next: Re: AOL and odd Reply-to
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com