--On Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:36 PM -0700 Chuq Von Rospach
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 07:48 PM, Tom Neff wrote:
>> Also, from a business standpoint, if you have a customer complaint
>> address and you encase it in a "how many GIF swirlies am I holding up"
>> hoop-jump, you could be liable under various consumer protection statutes.
> if there's so much spam you don't bother reading the address or disable it
> instead, what's the lesser evil here?
It doesn't matter which of those is the lesser evil, because it's a false
dichotomy. You spam protect the complaint address and then read it