Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Tom Neff <tneff @ grassyhill . net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 00:59:27 -0400
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <9D83CC20-7C57-11D7-8705-0003934516A8 @ plaidworks . com>
References: <9D83CC20-7C57-11D7-8705-0003934516A8 @ plaidworks . com>

--On Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:36 PM -0700 Chuq Von Rospach
<chuqui @
 plaidworks .
 com> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 07:48  PM, Tom Neff wrote:
[...]
>> Also, from a business standpoint, if you have a customer complaint 
>> address and you encase it in a "how many GIF swirlies am I holding up" 
>> hoop-jump, you could be liable under various consumer protection statutes.
> 
> if there's so much spam you don't bother reading the address or disable it
> instead, what's the lesser evil here?

It doesn't matter which of those is the lesser evil, because it's a false
dichotomy.  You spam protect the complaint address and then read it
religiously.



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Next: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Next: Re: So I got this 411 spam this morning...
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com